Showing posts with label announces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label announces. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Microsoft Set to Announce Next-Gen Security Software

Microsoft is unveiling next-generation security software, code-named Stirling, at the huge RSA Conference next week.

The world's largest security conference will kick off next week in San Francisco with the public unveiling of Microsoft's next-generation of security software, code-named Stirling.

Over the past few months, Microsoft has quietly shown the software to a select group of users, but sources familiar with the company's plans said that it will release a beta version of the code to users during the RSA Conference next Tuesday. Microsoft will allow attendees to "see new technologies," including Stirling and the company's next-generation Windows Server 2008 software, according to the conference agenda.

Microsoft's Forefront product line has been playing with more established security products over the past few years, but with Stirling the company will finally be able to offer administrators a single product that manages all of its security offerings.

"Stirling will touch many different areas of network protection, server protection and client protection," said Ronald Beekelaar, an independent IT consultant based in Amsterdam, who is familiar with the Forefront products. "So Microsoft has to coordinate that between different products. But that also means that beta testers should really look at Stirling at all those levels, and not just test the client protection, or only the firewall protection," he wrote in an e-mail interview.


Stirling's management and reporting capabilities, and its tight integration with Microsoft's other products will give enterprise users new tools for tracking malware and staying on top of the "health" of the computers on their network, he added.

After running the product through beta testing phase, Microsoft expects to ship Stirling by the end of June 2009.

Although Microsoft's security announcements are always closely watched, it will not be the only company making news at the conference. IBM plans to introduce new security projects, software and services products, and storage vendor EMC is expected to shed some more light on how it plans to tie together recent acquisitions such as Tablus, Network Intelligence and Documentum.

"EMC is determined to show its value in the information lifecycle," said Nick Selby, research director with the 451 Group, an industry analyst firm.

Symantec CEO John Thompson will keynote at the show Tuesday, the same day his company is set to release its semi-annual Internet Security Threat Report.

Hard drive vendor Seagate Technology will provide an update on the data center hard-drive encryption products it is developing in conjunction with IBM and storage component maker LSI. The companies have been working since last year to bring Seagate's Full Disk Encryption (FDE) technology to enterprise-class storage systems.

Show attendees who find the vendor pitches a bit much can walk down Howard Street at lunchtime Wednesday to catch open-source security vendor Untangle's DeepThroat Fight Club, which will pit rival Web filtering products against each other to see how well they do at blocking pornographic Web sites. The gloves come off at 12:15 at the Thirsty Bear Restaurant and Brewery.

Although RSA got its start as a small-scale conference for cryptographers, it's now the largest security event in the world, with an expanding agenda to match.

For the first time ever, the show will have talks from security researchers, who have traditionally stayed away from RSA in favor of the Black Hat conference, which is held each August in Las Vegas. In all, there will be more than 220 sessions at RSA this year, covering tracks such as legal issues, technical features, and, of course, cryptography.

"It obviously has grown in terms of the number of constituencies that it tries to satisfy," said Tim Mather, chief security strategist with RSA Conferences.

RSA runs from Tuesday to Friday next week at San Francisco's Moscone Center. More than 17,000 attendees are expected.

Adobe Announces Creative Suite 4

Adobe is introducing a 64-bit version of Creative Suite 4 for Windows Vista; Mac users will have to wait.

Adobe will introduce a 64-bit enabled version of Creative Suite 4, but initially only Windows Vista users will get 64-bit versions across the board. Mac users have to wait for 64-bit versions of some aps, including Photoshop, and Carbon is the culprit, the company explains.

This is because many of the applications which make up CS4 (including Photoshop) are written in the Carbon development language rather than Cocoa. When at WWDC 2007 Apple revealed that it would not support 64-bit in Carbon, Adobe realized it would need to rewrite some of its applications in Cocoa, Apple's collection of frameworks, APIs, and accompanying runtimes that make up the development layer of Mac OS X, before the applications would be able to take advantage of 64-bit computing power.

"We have to rewrite from scratch," said Adobe Photoshop product manager John Nack. "This makes the cost of the move considerably greater than for Windows. So we will ship 64-bit Windows version first," he added.


When Carbon-64 was cancelled Adobe "took resources from the CS4 effort" to focus on the switch to Cocoa. "But we didn't think we should sacrifice the whole CS4 feature set for 64-bit on the Mac," revealed Nack.

Luckily the company wrote its relatively new Lightroom application in Cocoa so the transition to 64-bit can be immediate in that case, which is why the company introduced a 64-bit beta version of Lightroom to Mac users this morning.

When asked whether Adobe should have recognized the transition to Cocoa from Carbon sooner, Nack explained that while some might think that if software wants to be taken seriously as a Mac application it should be written in Cocoa, but "Apple's Finder is written in Carbon."

Nack would reveal no details of a shipping date for the new version of Creative Suite, saying that: "There is no time scale for CS4," and that it is: "Too early to say when we can deliver 64-bit for Mac."

He added that the next version of Photoshop will ship in 32- and 64-bit versions for Windows, with a simultaneous release of the software for the Mac, though the 64-bit version for Mac will be a subsequent release.

64-bit hype?

The delay may not matter too much. Nack doesn't appear convinced that being able to exploit 64-bit computing immediately would be a great benefit to all Photoshop users.

"The real strength of 64-bit's is letting you address a large amount of memory. You'll see the biggest difference when working with large images or moving around a lot of data," he explained. To take advantage of 64-bit you need "more than 4GB Ram allocated to Photoshop," he added.

"If you are a web user moving files around then you won't see much difference. Where you will see a substantial performance increase is with large files -- for example it could cut the time it takes to open a large image from 200 to 70 seconds.

"For pros it matters, for normal people it is more of a marginal performance difference.

"We don't want to overhype 64-bit with expectations that aren't going to be matched," he added.

But regardless of the status of 64-bit right now, Nack believes that getting set-up with 64-bit now is good because it will future-proof the Creative Suite applications for a time when all PCs and Macs support 64-bit and feature adequate RAM as standard.

Saturday, March 29, 2008

AMD announces tri-core, tweaked quad-core Phenoms CPUs

AMD has formally unwrapped its three-core Phenom X3 8000 series, along with new versions of its existing quad-core Phenom X4 processors, now known as the 9050 line.

The three-core Phenom X3s, first announced back in September 2007 just ahead of AMD arch-rival Intel's bi-annual Developer Forum, are detailed just before the next IDF is due to kick off in Shanghai.

The initial line comprises the 2.1GHz 8400 and the 2.3GHz 8600, but AMD's launch presentation also detailed their successors: the 2.1GHz 8450, the 2.3GHz 8650 and the 2.4GHz 8750.
AMD said the 8450 and 8650 will be priced at, respectively, $160 and $180 when sold in batches of 1000 CPUs - pretty much what the 8400 and 8600 chips cost. The processors have 1.5MB of L2, 512KB per core, and 2MB of shared L3 cache.

Interestingly, AMD's benchmarks show the 8650 forecast to outperform the current, 2.3GHz X4 9600 by a couple of percentage points and the 2.3GHz 8600 by just over nine per cent. The 2.3GHz 9650 is eight per cent faster than the 9600.

That's the the improved 'B3' core stepping, a feature of the 9x50 and 8x50 CPUs, coming into play. The B3 X3s are expected in May, so there's arguably little point jumping straight to the 8400 and the 8600. AMD insisted the older core was "perfectly fine".

AMD also took the wraps off the 2.2GHz 9550, the 2.3GHz 9650, the 2.4GHz 9750 and the 2.5GHz 9850. Like the X3s, these X4s consume up to 95W of power and almost all of them sit on a 3.6GHz HyperTransport bus. The exception is the 9850, which has a bus clocked at 4GHz. It's also a 'Black Edition' part, aimed at gamers and unlocked for overclocking.

AMD announced the 9100e, a 1.8GHz four-core part that consumes 65W. Like the other new X4s, it has 2MB of L2 - again, 512KB per core - and 2MB of shared L3 cache. It runs on a 3.6GHz HT bus.

The part's pitched at media centre systems, and AMD claimed it was the "only 65W TDP quad-core processor on the market"

The 9550 will cost $199, the 9750 $240 and the 9850 $260, AMD said.

The chip maker also mentioned the existing 3GHz dual-core Athlon X2 6000+, which was handy because the old processor manages to out-perform the 8650 and 8450 in certain AMD-run benchmarks, including MPEG 2 to MPEG 4 video transcoding, and generating a slideshow movie from a stack of JPEG photos.
Actually, AMD's presentation slide covering the latter test doesn't mention the three-core part at all - presumably because the comparison with the 6000+ is not flattering. The video test has the 6000+ down as three per cent faster than the 8650.

To be fair, the 8650 is 27 per cent faster than the 6000+ at converting an "HD video file" to a mobile screen-sized MPEG 4 file.